MYBOS vs BuildingLink

Yes, for the operational core. Both platforms cover work orders, preventative maintenance, asset registers, inspections, contractor compliance, key and visitor management, parcels and a resident portal. MYBOS adds recurring statutory compliance scheduling that BuildingLink does not publish.

The features BuildingLink has that MYBOS does not are resident-lifestyle extras: a neighbour marketplace, digital staff tipping and managed building websites. If your accountability sits with the building – its assets, its certifications, its contractors – MYBOS covers more of what you are actually responsible for.

Yes. MYBOS is available to building and facility teams globally, and already supports 8,000+ building managers across 200+ companies.

The compliance engine is built around the shape of a statutory obligation – a dated requirement, a responsible party, a certifier and an evidence trail – rather than around one country’s legislation. Australian and New Zealand regimes are the proof it works against real named forms. Confirm local support hours and any jurisdiction-specific compliance configuration with a MYBOS representative for your region.

BuildingLink does not publish pricing – evaluation runs through a vendor quote. MYBOS pricing depends on how many lots you manage, so a per-building figure quoted out of context tends to mislead.

Work out what MYBOS would cost for your building, or book a demo and ask for a written quote based on your lot count.

Yes, and we’ll handle most of it for you. We’ll import your core building data from BuildingLink, lots/units, resident and owner contact details, contractor records, assets, and maintenance schedules, along with historical records such as closed and open work orders, where they’re included in the export. Once we have the export files, we take over: we’ll review everything, clean it up, and prepare it for import, so you don’t need to worry about it. If anything’s missing or unclear, we’ll come back to you before we load it.

It depends on portfolio size, how much historical data you migrate and how many sites go live at once – a single building is a different exercise from a forty-building portfolio. Neither vendor publishes a fixed timeline.

Worth knowing: BuildingLink reviewers on Capterra describe a steep learning curve at implementation (accessed September 2026). Ask for a staged timeline written against your own portfolio, with named responsibilities at each stage.

Yes. MYBOS tracks the obligation itself – what is due, when, who signs it off and where the evidence lives – rather than leaving it to a reminder and a spreadsheet. New South Wales Annual Fire Safety Statements and Victorian essential safety measures are handled in the platform.

BuildingLink does not publish handling for either regime on its own site. That is the clearest functional difference between the two platforms for anyone carrying a compliance obligation.

Yes. The MYBOS resident portal and app cover requests and communication, amenity and facility bookings, broadcast messages, a document library, voting polls, parcel notifications and visitor management.

BuildingLink carries more resident-lifestyle extras – a neighbour marketplace and services directory, digital staff tipping and managed building websites. MYBOS covers the resident features building managers are accountable for, and puts the operational depth behind them.

Both platforms cover building management, maintenance and resident communication. MYBOS has a strong focus on maintenance, asset management, contractor management, inspections and compliance, helping building managers keep day-to-day operations organised in one place.